JRSBRT 9.4, p. 325-330

After payment has been processed for your order of a digital copy (PDF) of this article, you will see a download link on your completed order page and also receive an email containing a download link. The links, which will enable you to download one copy of the article, will expire after 24 hours.

Dosimetric comparison of photon and proton radiosurgery for large arteriovenous malformations
Roman L Travis, Travis J Atchley, Martha H Chadband, Michael H Soike, Michael C Dobelbower and Philip Gr Schmalz

Purpose: Radiosurgery for large arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is limited by toxicity from dose spillage into normal brain, worsened by larger gradient indices in bigger targets. Proton radiosurgery theoretically reduces integral dose but has greater uncertainty due to robust planning constraints and fewer beam angles. This study evaluates whether pencil beam scanning radiosurgery (PBSR) improves normal brain dosimetry while maintaining comparable target coverage to photon radiosurgery.

Methods: The 10 largest AVMs treated with photon radiosurgery at a single institution were re-planned for PBSR in Varian Eclipse. Proton plans incorporated a 2% computed tomography (CT) density correction and 2 mm range uncertainty, with 2–4 beams per institutional practice. Plans prioritized isotoxicity to organs at risk (OARs) before matching target coverage. Dosimetric metrics were compared using a paired t-test.

Results: Median AVM size was 36.6 cc (24.3–60.1 cc). All plans prescribed 1750 cGy in one fraction. PBSR had higher gradient indices and reduced target coverage near OARs compared to photon radiosurgery. While PBSR lowered normal brain mean dose and V_{5 Gy}, it increased V_{12 Gy}, a known predictor of toxicity.

Conclusions: PBSR, as planned with current institutional constraints, leads to greater high-dose spill into normal brain and inferior target coverage near OARs. Future improvements in PBSR, such as dual-energy CT, additional beam angles, and LET-based planning, may help mitigate these limitations.

Keywords: proton beam therapy; arteriovenous malformation; radiosurgery