Additional Information

Site Information

 Loading... Please wait...
  • Image 1

JRSBRT 5.4, p. 323-330


Product Description

An evaluation of the consistency of shifts reported by three different systems for non-coplanar treatments
Vikren Sarkar, Adam Paxton, Martin W Szegedi, Hui Zhao, Long Huang, Geoff Nelson, Yu-Huei Jessica Huang, Fanchi Su, Prema Rassiah-Szegedi and Bill J Salter

Treatment of intra-cranial lesions sometimes requires a non-coplanar beam configuration. One of the most commonly used IGRT modalities, kV conebeam CT, cannot typically be used when large couch rotations are introduced. However, multiple other systems allow for imaging/tracking the patient for such situations. This work compares shift consistency from three independent systems, namely Varian’s Advanced Imaging, Brainlab’s Exactrac and Varian’s OSMS, all installed on the same linear accelerator. After a phantom was first positioned using conebeam CT, the three systems were used to determine shifts at different couch positions. This was done with and without intentional shifts inserted in the original phantom position. Results show that the difference in shifts between the three systems was never more than 0.7 mm (average of 0.2 mm, standard deviation of 0.2 mm). These results confirm that all three systems are equivalent to within 1 mm and may potentially be uses interchangeably, especially in cases where the PTV margin is on the order of 1 mm.

Keywords: image guided radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, surface monitoring, intrafractional motion monitoring

After payment has been processed for your order of a digital copy (PDF) of this article, you will see a download link on your completed order page and also receive an email containing a download link. The links, which will enable you to download one copy of the article, will expire after 24 hours.

Find Similar Products by Category